Square Root Of 2: Value 1.4142, Proof And Methods

#Algebra
TL;DR
The square root of 2 is about 1.4142 (1.41421356…1.41421356\ldots), an irrational number with no exact decimal or fraction. Below: the proof, long division, the Babylonian method and six worked examples.
BT
Bhanzu TeamLast updated on October 21, 202611 min read

What Is A Square Root?

A square root of a number nn is a number rr with r2=nr^2 = n. Both 2\sqrt{2} and −2-\sqrt{2} square to 2, so the equation x2=2x^2 = 2 has two solutions.

The radical sign alone means the principal (non-negative) square root. So 2≈1.4142\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4142, never −1.4142-1.4142.

Does The Square Root Of 2 Really Exist If It Never Ends?

Yes. Draw a unit square and its diagonal is a real, measurable length whose square is 2.

Squaring also traps it. Because 1.42=1.961.4^2 = 1.96 and 1.52=2.251.5^2 = 2.25, the number lies between 1.4 and 1.5, and each extra decimal place narrows the gap further without ever closing it.

Where Does 2\sqrt{2} Show Up, And Why Does It Matter?

The square root of 2 is the length of the diagonal of any square with side 1. The Pythagoras theorem gives it directly: 12+12=21^2 + 1^2 = 2, so the diagonal is 2\sqrt{2}.

Scale the square and the diagonal scales with it. A square of side ss has a diagonal of s2s\sqrt{2}, which is the diagonal of square formula used in tiling, carpentry and screen sizes.

The same number sits inside every isosceles right triangle, the 45-45-90 shape. That is why sin 45 degrees equals 22≈0.7071\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 0.7071.

Paper uses it too. When Germany standardised the A series of paper sizes, it chose the ratio 2:1\sqrt{2} : 1 (Wikipedia, Square root of 2), so folding an A4 sheet in half gives an A5 sheet with exactly the same shape.

Quick Reference Table

The square roots of 1 to 10 show how rare whole-number answers are. Only 1, 4 and 9 give rational roots in this range.

Number nn

n\sqrt{n} (simplified)

Decimal (4 dp)

Rational?

1

11

1.0000

Yes

2

2\sqrt{2}

1.4142

No

3

3\sqrt{3}

1.7321

No

4

22

2.0000

Yes

5

5\sqrt{5}

2.2361

No

6

6\sqrt{6}

2.4495

No

7

7\sqrt{7}

2.6458

No

8

222\sqrt{2}

2.8284

No

9

33

3.0000

Yes

10

10\sqrt{10}

3.1623

No

Notice that 8=22\sqrt{8} = 2\sqrt{2}: the square root of 2 keeps reappearing inside other roots. The square root 1 to 25 table extends this list.

Is The Square Root Of 2 Rational Or Irrational?

The square root of 2 is irrational. It cannot be written as pq\frac{p}{q} with whole numbers pp and qq, so it is not a rational number, and its decimal never ends or repeats.

This was probably the first number ever shown to be an irrational number. The proof below is short enough to check line by line.

How Do You Prove The Square Root Of 2 Is Irrational By Contradiction?

Assume the opposite and show it breaks.

  1. Suppose 2=pq\sqrt{2} = \frac{p}{q}, where pp and qq are whole numbers with no common factor.

  2. Square both sides: 2=p2q22 = \frac{p^2}{q^2}, so p2=2q2p^2 = 2q^2.

  3. Then p2p^2 is even, which forces pp to be even (an odd number squared is odd).

  4. Write p=2kp = 2k. Then 4k2=2q24k^2 = 2q^2, so q2=2k2q^2 = 2k^2.

  5. Now q2q^2 is even, so qq is even too.

  6. Both pp and qq are even, so they share the factor 2. That contradicts step 1.

No such fraction exists, so 2\sqrt{2} is irrational. The same argument, with 3 in place of 2, appears in the proof that root 3 is irrational.

Is There A Geometric Proof That 2\sqrt{2} Is Irrational?

There is, and it needs only squares. Suppose a whole-number square of side pp had exactly the same area as two whole-number squares of side qq, so p2=2q2p^2 = 2q^2 with pp as small as possible.

Place the two qq-squares in opposite corners of the pp-square. They overlap in a small square of side 2q−p2q - p, and they leave two uncovered corner squares of side p−qp - q.

The overlap must equal the uncovered area, so (2q−p)2=2(p−q)2(2q - p)^2 = 2(p - q)^2. That is a smaller whole-number solution of the same equation, which contradicts "as small as possible".

How Do You Find The Square Root Of 2?

Four hand methods give the decimal, and each one shows a different side of the number. None of them ever finishes, which is the irrationality showing up in practice.

Method 1: Long Division

Write 2 as 2.00,00,00,002.00,00,00,00 and work one pair of zeros at a time. At each step, double the root found so far, then choose the largest digit dd so that (doubled root with dd attached) ×,d\times, d fits.

Step

Current number

Trial divisor ×\times digit

Product

Remainder

Root so far

1

2

1×11 \times 1

1

1

1

2

100

24×424 \times 4

96

4

1.4

3

400

281×1281 \times 1

281

119

1.41

4

11900

2824×42824 \times 4

11296

604

1.414

5

60400

28282×228282 \times 2

56564

3836

1.4142

6

383600

282841×1282841 \times 1

282841

100759

1.41421

At step 2, the next digit could not be 5, since 25×5=12525 \times 5 = 125 is more than 100. The remainder never reaches zero, so the digits keep coming: 1.414213…1.414213\ldots

Method 2: Squaring Estimates

Guess, square, and adjust. This is slower than long division but needs nothing beyond multiplication.

  1. 12=11^2 = 1 and 22=42^2 = 4, so the root is between 1 and 2.

  2. 1.42=1.961.4^2 = 1.96 and 1.52=2.251.5^2 = 2.25, so it is between 1.4 and 1.5.

  3. 1.412=1.98811.41^2 = 1.9881 and 1.422=2.01641.42^2 = 2.0164, so it is between 1.41 and 1.42.

  4. 1.41422=1.999961641.4142^2 = 1.99996164, just under 2, so 2≈1.4142\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4142.

Method 3: The Babylonian Method

Start with a guess xx, then replace it with the average of xx and 2x\frac{2}{x}. If xx is too big, 2x\frac{2}{x} is too small, so their average lands closer.

xnew=12(x+2x)x_{\text{new}} = \frac{1}{2}\left(x + \frac{2}{x}\right)

Round

Value

Error

Start

1

1

1.5

about 0.0858

2

1.416666...

about 0.00245

3

1.414215686...

about 0.0000021

4

1.414213562374...

about 0.0000000000016

The number of correct digits roughly doubles each round. Calculators use refinements of this same idea, which is also known as Newton's method.

Method 4: Prime Factorization

Prime factorization simplifies a root by pulling out pairs of equal factors. Since 2 is itself prime, there is no pair to pull out.

2=2\sqrt{2} = \sqrt{2}

The radical stays as it is. This method does not give a decimal for 2\sqrt{2}, but it is the method that turns 8\sqrt{8} into 222\sqrt{2} or 50\sqrt{50} into 525\sqrt{2}, which the simplifying radical expressions page covers in full.

Can The Square Root Of 2 Be Written As A Fraction?

Not exactly, because it is irrational. A fraction can only approximate it, and some fractions do that remarkably well.

Fraction

Decimal

Error

p2−2q2p^2 - 2q^2

32\frac{3}{2}

1.5

+0.0858

1

75\frac{7}{5}

1.4

-0.0142

-1

1712\frac{17}{12}

1.416667

+0.00245

1

4129\frac{41}{29}

1.413793

-0.00042

-1

9970\frac{99}{70}

1.414286

+0.0000722

1

577408\frac{577}{408}

1.414216

+0.0000021

1

Each fraction misses the equation p2=2q2p^2 = 2q^2 by exactly 1, which is why none can ever hit 2\sqrt{2} itself. The ancient Indian Sulba Sutras already used 577408\frac{577}{408}, and a Babylonian clay tablet, YBC 7289, records 1;24,51,101;24,51,10 in base 60, which is 1.4142129631.414212963 in decimals (MacTutor).

Why Is The Square Root Of 2 Divided By 2 The Same As 1 Over Root 2?

They are the same number written two ways. Multiply the top and bottom of 12\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} by 2\sqrt{2}:

12=1×22×2\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{1 \times \sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{2}}

=22= \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}

≈0.7071\approx 0.7071

This step is called rationalising the denominator, and 22\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} is the standard form. Halve it again and 24≈0.3536\frac{\sqrt{2}}{4} \approx 0.3536.

Examples Of Square Root Of 2

Example 1

A square tile has sides of 5 cm. How long is its diagonal?

d=52d = 5\sqrt{2}

≈5×1.41421\approx 5 \times 1.41421

≈7.0711 cm\approx 7.0711 \text{ cm}

Example 2

Simplify 2+2\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{2}.

It is tempting to combine the numbers under one root: 2+2=4=2\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{2} = \sqrt{4} = 2.

Check with decimals. Each 2\sqrt{2} is about 1.414, so the sum is about 2.828, not 2.

Treat 2\sqrt{2} like a unit, the way x+x=2xx + x = 2x:

2+2=22\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{2} = 2\sqrt{2}

≈2.8284\approx 2.8284

Example 3

Simplify 50+18\sqrt{50} + \sqrt{18}.

50=25×2=52\sqrt{50} = \sqrt{25 \times 2} = 5\sqrt{2}

18=9×2=32\sqrt{18} = \sqrt{9 \times 2} = 3\sqrt{2}

52+32=825\sqrt{2} + 3\sqrt{2} = 8\sqrt{2}

≈11.3137\approx 11.3137

The square root of 50 and the square root of 8 both simplify to a multiple of 2\sqrt{2} in the same way.

Example 4

Rationalise 42\frac{4}{\sqrt{2}}.

42=422\frac{4}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{4\sqrt{2}}{2}

=22= 2\sqrt{2}

≈2.8284\approx 2.8284

Example 5

Given 2≈1.4142\sqrt{2} \approx 1.4142, find 0.02\sqrt{0.02} and 200\sqrt{200}.

0.02=2100=210≈0.1414\sqrt{0.02} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{100}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{10} \approx 0.1414

200=100×2=102≈14.142\sqrt{200} = \sqrt{100 \times 2} = 10\sqrt{2} \approx 14.142

The first instinct is often to match 0.02\sqrt{0.02} with 0.2\sqrt{0.2}, but the decimal must be written over a perfect square such as 100 before the root comes out cleanly.

Example 6

Expand (1+2)2(1 + \sqrt{2})^2 and find (2+1)(2−1)(\sqrt{2} + 1)(\sqrt{2} - 1).

(1+2)2=1+22+2(1 + \sqrt{2})^2 = 1 + 2\sqrt{2} + 2

=3+22≈5.8284= 3 + 2\sqrt{2} \approx 5.8284

(2+1)(2−1)=2−1(\sqrt{2} + 1)(\sqrt{2} - 1) = 2 - 1

=1= 1

Two irrational numbers can multiply to a whole number, which is exactly the trick behind rationalising.

Where Do Students Go Wrong With The Square Root Of 2?

Mistake 1: Treating 1.414 As The Exact Value

Where it slips in: Any problem that asks for an exact answer, or a long calculation that reuses the decimal.

Don't do this: Writing 2=1.414\sqrt{2} = 1.414 and carrying it through. In fact 1.4142=1.9993961.414^2 = 1.999396, not 2.

The correct way: Keep 2\sqrt{2} as a symbol until the last line, then round once. Students who round at the start see small errors grow with every multiplication, and the fix is a habit, not a formula.

Mistake 2: Adding Under One Root

Where it slips in: Sums of different roots, such as 2+3\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}.

Don't do this: Writing 2+3=5\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{5}. The left side is about 3.1463 and 5\sqrt{5} is about 2.2361.

The correct way: Only like roots combine (32+52=823\sqrt{2} + 5\sqrt{2} = 8\sqrt{2}). Products do merge, so 2×3=6\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{3} = \sqrt{6}; the memoriser who learned "roots combine" without the word "multiply" is the one who writes 5\sqrt{5} here.

Mistake 3: Dropping The Negative Solution

Where it slips in: Solving x2=2x^2 = 2.

Don't do this: Answering only x=2x = \sqrt{2}.

The correct way: Write x=2x = \sqrt{2} or x=−2x = -\sqrt{2}, since (−2)2=2(-\sqrt{2})^2 = 2 as well. The radical sign gives the positive root, but the equation asks for every number that squares to 2.

Where Can You Get Help With Irrational Numbers And Radicals?

Irrational numbers, radicals and proofs by contradiction are where many students first meet real mathematical reasoning. Working through them with a teacher who explains each step makes the ideas stick.

You can work one-to-one with an algebra tutor, get support from a high school math tutor for proofs and radicals, or arrange regular math tutoring through the school year.

Conclusion

  • The square root of 2 is about 1.4142, the diagonal of a square with side 1.

  • It is irrational: assuming 2=pq\sqrt{2} = \frac{p}{q} makes both pp and qq even, a contradiction.

  • Long division, squaring estimates and the Babylonian method all approach 1.41421356 without ever finishing.

  • Fractions such as 9970\frac{99}{70} and 577408\frac{577}{408} come close, but no fraction is exact.

  • 12=22≈0.7071\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 0.7071, and only like roots combine when you add.

Practice These Before Moving On

  1. Find 2×8\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{8}.

  2. Simplify 32\sqrt{32} and give its decimal to 4 places.

  3. Rationalise 32\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}}.

  4. A square has sides of 3 m. Find its diagonal to 4 decimal places.

  5. Square the fraction 9970\frac{99}{70}. How far is the result from 2?

Answers:

  • Answer to Question 1: 44

  • Answer to Question 2: 42≈5.65694\sqrt{2} \approx 5.6569

  • Answer to Question 3: 322≈2.1213\frac{3\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 2.1213

  • Answer to Question 4: 32≈4.24263\sqrt{2} \approx 4.2426 m

  • Answer to Question 5: 98014900≈2.000204\frac{9801}{4900} \approx 2.000204, about 0.0002 above 2

If Question 2 stalls, return to Method 4 and look for the largest perfect square inside 32. Want a teacher to check your working? Book a free demo class.

Read More

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us write better content

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the square root of 2 times the square root of 2?
Exactly 2. Multiplying a square root by itself undoes the root, so 2×2=2\sqrt{2} \times \sqrt{2} = 2.
What is the square root of 2 times the square root of 3?
6≈2.4495\sqrt{6} \approx 2.4495, because a×b=ab\sqrt{a} \times \sqrt{b} = \sqrt{ab} for non-negative numbers.
Is the square root of 2 a real number?
Yes. It is irrational, but irrational numbers are still real numbers, and it has a place on the number line between 1.41 and 1.42.
Why is the square root of 2 not 1?
Because 1×1=11 \times 1 = 1, not 2. The root has to be bigger than 1, and since 1.52=2.251.5^2 = 2.25 is too big, it sits between 1 and 1.5.
What is 2 times the square root of 2 in radical form?
222\sqrt{2}, which equals 8\sqrt{8} and is about 2.8284. Moving the 2 inside the root squares it: 22=4×22\sqrt{2} = \sqrt{4 \times 2}.
What is the square root of 2 to 10 decimal places?
1.41421356241.4142135624 (rounded). The digits continue as 1.41421356237309504880…1.41421356237309504880\ldots without a repeating pattern.
✍️ Written By
BT
Bhanzu Team
Content Creator and Editor
Bhanzu’s editorial team, known as Team Bhanzu, is made up of experienced educators, curriculum experts, content strategists, and fact-checkers dedicated to making math simple and engaging for learners worldwide. Every article and resource is carefully researched, thoughtfully structured, and rigorously reviewed to ensure accuracy, clarity, and real-world relevance. We understand that building strong math foundations can raise questions for students and parents alike. That’s why Team Bhanzu focuses on delivering practical insights, concept-driven explanations, and trustworthy guidance-empowering learners to develop confidence, speed, and a lifelong love for mathematics.
Related Articles
Book a FREE Demo ClassBook Now →