— irrational, non-terminating, non-repeating. The simplified radical form is what most textbook problems expect; the decimal is what a calculator returns.
Result:
Notation: Simplified radical form ; decimal approximation (4 d.p.).
Method shown: Prime factorization (Quick), repeated subtraction (Standard, with a Wrong-Path-First detour), long division (Stretch).
Approximate value: (11 d.p.).
Exact form: — cannot be reduced further, since is prime.
Quick Reference Table — Square Roots Near 50
(exact form) | (4 d.p.) | Nearest perfect square | |
|---|---|---|---|
(itself) | |||
(itself) |
sits between and — closer to because is one away from , and away from .
Where √50 shows up
is the diagonal of a square — by Pythagoras, . The same value appears as the hypotenuse of any right triangle with two legs of length , and as the distance between the points and on a coordinate plane. In physics, shows up in the magnitude of a vector with equal and components of units.
What "square root of 50" means
The square root of a non-negative number is the value such that . For , the positive with . Because and , lives between and .
The simplified-radical form extracts the part of that is a perfect square (the ) and leaves the rest under the radical. The decimal form comes from numerically approximating the irrational tail.
Is √50 rational or irrational?
is irrational. Reason: a number is a perfect square if and only if every prime in its factorisation appears to an even power. — the pairs up neatly into , but the stands alone with exponent . That lone is the reason doesn't collapse to an integer.
The decimal neither terminates nor repeats. Like every irrational, it can be approximated but never written out exactly in decimal form.
How to find √50 — three methods
Method 1 — Prime factorization (Quick)
Break into prime factors, then pair them up.
Pull the pair of s out of the radical:
Final answer: .
This is the method most useful when the question asks for simplified radical form. It takes one line once you see the pair of s.
Method 2 — Repeated subtraction (Standard, Wrong-Path-First)
A common student instinct is to try subtracting odd numbers from — the trick that works for perfect squares. Let us walk it through and let it break.
Start at . Subtract consecutive odd numbers: , , , , , , . After seven subtractions, the remainder is — not .
That non-zero remainder is the signal: is not a perfect square. The method only finds a clean integer root when subtraction ends exactly at zero (try it on — seven subtractions, remainder , so ).
The rescue is prime factorization. , so . The repeated-subtraction step still earned its keep — it told us within seven moves that we'd need the radical form, not an integer.
Final answer: .
Method 3 — Long division (Stretch)
For a decimal approximation to four places, run the long-division algorithm on .
Step 1. Largest integer with square is (). Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 2. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 3. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 4. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Continuing produces to four decimals, and rounded.
Final answer: .
Tripping points to avoid on √50
1. Treating as — confusing the operation with division by 2
Where it slips in: Students rushing through the problem read "square root" as "half" and answer .
Don't do this: .
The correct way: Square root asks: what number multiplied by itself gives ? Not . The rusher archetype hits this slip on the first attempt; the fix is to check by squaring back — if , is wrong.
2. Stopping at when the question asks for radical form
Where it slips in: A test question says "express in simplest radical form." The student returns or .
Don't do this: — written as the final answer when the question asked for an exact form.
The correct way: . The decimal is an approximation; is exact. Read the question's verb — "evaluate" expects decimal, "simplify" expects the radical.
3. Pulling out the wrong factor under the radical
Where it slips in: Students see but try to pull both out: .
Don't do this: .
The correct way: Only the perfect-square factor leaves the radical, and it leaves as its square root — , not . The stays under, because has no integer square root. So .
Conclusion
The square root of 50 simplifies to — exact form — and approximates to as a decimal.
is irrational; the prime factor inside the radical has no partner.
Three methods reach the answer: prime factorization (one line), repeated subtraction (signals the irrationality), long division (gives the decimal).
Only perfect-square factors leave the radical, and they leave as their square root — not as themselves.
is the diagonal of any square, which is why the Pythagorean theorem reproduces it constantly.
A practical next step
Show that simplifies to using prime factorization.
Find to two decimal places using long division (without copying the worked example).
A square has side length cm. Find its diagonal in exact and decimal form.
Want a live Bhanzu trainer to walk through more square-root problems? Book a free demo class — online globally.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us write better content

