Cube Root 1 to 100 - Chart, Values, and How to Find Them

#Algebra
TL;DR
Cube root 1 to 100 covers every root from 13\sqrt[3]{1} to 1003\sqrt[3]{100}: only four are whole numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, from the perfect cubes 1, 8, 27, 64), and the rest are irrational decimals. This hub gives a key-value chart to three places, the perfect-cube pattern, how to compute a cube root by hand, and links to individual roots.
BT
Bhanzu TeamLast updated on August 15, 20267 min read

What Does Cube Root 1 To 100 Mean?

The cube root of a number nn is the value rr with r×r×r=nr \times r \times r = n. So 273=3\sqrt[3]{27} = 3 because 33=273^3 = 27, and 643=4\sqrt[3]{64} = 4 because 43=644^3 = 64.

Cube roots are written two ways: with the radical and its index 3, as n3\sqrt[3]{n}, or as a fractional exponent, n1/3n^{1/3}. The two mean the same thing, and the exponent form connects straight to the wider rules of rational exponents.

Between 1 and 100, only four numbers are perfect cubes. The other 96 have cube roots that are irrational: decimals that never terminate or repeat.

What Are The Key Cube Root Values From 1 To 100?

The chart gives each cube root in radical form, exponential form, and its decimal to three places. The four exact whole-number roots are shown in bold.

nn

Radical

Exponential

Decimal

1

13\sqrt[3]{1}

11/31^{1/3}

1.000

2

23\sqrt[3]{2}

21/32^{1/3}

1.260

3

33\sqrt[3]{3}

31/33^{1/3}

1.442

4

43\sqrt[3]{4}

41/34^{1/3}

1.587

5

53\sqrt[3]{5}

51/35^{1/3}

1.710

6

63\sqrt[3]{6}

61/36^{1/3}

1.817

7

73\sqrt[3]{7}

71/37^{1/3}

1.913

8

83\sqrt[3]{8}

81/38^{1/3}

2.000

9

93\sqrt[3]{9}

91/39^{1/3}

2.080

10

103\sqrt[3]{10}

101/310^{1/3}

2.154

15

153\sqrt[3]{15}

151/315^{1/3}

2.466

20

203\sqrt[3]{20}

201/320^{1/3}

2.714

25

253\sqrt[3]{25}

251/325^{1/3}

2.924

27

273\sqrt[3]{27}

271/327^{1/3}

3.000

30

303\sqrt[3]{30}

301/330^{1/3}

3.107

40

403\sqrt[3]{40}

401/340^{1/3}

3.420

50

503\sqrt[3]{50}

501/350^{1/3}

3.684

60

603\sqrt[3]{60}

601/360^{1/3}

3.915

64

643\sqrt[3]{64}

641/364^{1/3}

4.000

70

703\sqrt[3]{70}

701/370^{1/3}

4.121

80

803\sqrt[3]{80}

801/380^{1/3}

4.309

90

903\sqrt[3]{90}

901/390^{1/3}

4.481

100

1003\sqrt[3]{100}

1001/3100^{1/3}

4.642

Which Numbers From 1 To 100 Are Perfect Cubes?

Exactly four: 1,8,27,641, 8, 27, 64, the values of 13,23,33,431^3, 2^3, 3^3, 4^3. Their cube roots are the whole numbers 1,2,3,41, 2, 3, 4. The next perfect cube, 53=1255^3 = 125, already jumps past 100.

The gaps between consecutive cubes widen fast:

1, 8, 27, 641,\ 8,\ 27,\ 64 gaps: 7, 19, 37\text{gaps: } 7,\ 19,\ 37

Because cubes spread out so quickly, only four fit inside 1 to 100, and every number between them has an irrational cube root. You can confirm any of the four against the perfect cube list at a glance.

How Do You Read And Use The Cube Root Table?

Each row pairs a number with its cube root in three forms. Use the radical or exponential form in algebra, and swap in the decimal only when you need a number. For 503\sqrt[3]{50}, the row gives about 3.684, enough for most calculations without a calculator.

To place a value not on the chart, bracket it between two listed roots. 453\sqrt[3]{45} sits between 403≈3.420\sqrt[3]{40} \approx 3.420 and 503≈3.684\sqrt[3]{50} \approx 3.684, so it is roughly 3.56. The same bracketing logic works for square roots and is the fastest mental check on the whole table.

How Do You Compute A Cube Root From 1 To 100?

Two methods cover the chart. How do you find a cube root without a calculator? Use prime factorization for perfect cubes and estimation for the rest.

Prime factorization (exact, for perfect cubes). Group identical primes into threes. For 643\sqrt[3]{64}:

64=26=23×2364 = 2^6 = 2^3 \times 2^3 643=2×2\sqrt[3]{64} = 2 \times 2 643=4\sqrt[3]{64} = 4

Estimation between perfect cubes (for non-perfect cubes). For 303\sqrt[3]{30}:

27<30<6427 < 30 < 64 3<303<43 < \sqrt[3]{30} < 4

Since 30 is much closer to 27 than to 64, the root is just above 3 (it is 3.107). For a full by-hand decimal, the long-division style method for cube roots follows the same triple-the-digits idea as long division for square roots. The underlying algorithm is documented in the standard reference on cube roots.

Examples Of Cube Root 1 To 100

Example 1

Find 273\sqrt[3]{27} and confirm it.

3×3×3=273 \times 3 \times 3 = 27 273=3\sqrt[3]{27} = 3

Final answer: 3, a rational cube root.

Example 2

Where the estimate goes wrong. To place 303\sqrt[3]{30}, a common guess is to split the range 3<303<43 < \sqrt[3]{30} < 4 down the middle, calling it 303≈3.5\sqrt[3]{30} \approx 3.5. Does that hold? Cubing gives 3.53=42.8753.5^3 = 42.875, well past 30, so 3.5 is far too high. Cube roots are not evenly spaced across the range - because cubing grows fast, most of the interval belongs to values near 4. Since 30 is close to 27, the root barely clears 3.

Final answer: 303≈3.11\sqrt[3]{30} \approx 3.11, not 3.5.

Example 3

Evaluate 21+264321 + 2\sqrt[3]{64}.

643=4\sqrt[3]{64} = 4 2×4=82 \times 4 = 8 21+8=2921 + 8 = 29

Final answer: 29.

Example 4

Order 103\sqrt[3]{10}, 503\sqrt[3]{50}, and 903\sqrt[3]{90}.

103≈2.154,503≈3.684,903≈4.481\sqrt[3]{10} \approx 2.154,\quad \sqrt[3]{50} \approx 3.684,\quad \sqrt[3]{90} \approx 4.481

Final answer: 103<503<903\sqrt[3]{10} < \sqrt[3]{50} < \sqrt[3]{90}.

Example 5

A cube-shaped tank holds 50 cubic metres. How long is each edge?

edge=503\text{edge} = \sqrt[3]{50} edge≈3.684 m\text{edge} \approx 3.684 \text{ m}

Final answer: about 3.683.68 m per edge.

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Confusing a cube root with a square root

Where it slips in: Reading 643\sqrt[3]{64} as if the index were 2.

Don't do this: Writing 643=8\sqrt[3]{64} = 8 (that is the square root).

The correct way: The index 3 means "what cubed gives 64?" - the answer is 4, since 43=644^3 = 64. Always read the small 3 on the radical before solving. The step that prevents this is saying the index out loud: "cube root of 64."

Mistake 2: Assuming a cube root can be negative-only or dropping the index

Where it slips in: Writing a plain radical for a cube root.

Don't do this: Writing 27\sqrt{27} when you mean 273\sqrt[3]{27}.

The correct way: Keep the index: 273=3\sqrt[3]{27} = 3. Unlike square roots, a real cube root also exists for negative numbers (−273=−3\sqrt[3]{-27} = -3), so the index carries real meaning.

Mistake 3: Spacing the estimates evenly

Where it slips in: Guessing non-perfect cube roots by splitting the interval in half.

Don't do this: Placing 403\sqrt[3]{40} at the midpoint of 3 and 4.

The correct way: Weight the estimate toward the nearer cube. 40 sits between 27 and 64 but closer to 27's side of the curve, so 403≈3.42\sqrt[3]{40} \approx 3.42, below the midpoint.

Conclusion

The cube root 1 to 100 chart holds just four rational roots (1, 2, 3, 4) from the perfect cubes 1, 8, 27, and 64; every other cube root in the range is irrational. Read values in radical or exponential form, estimate non-perfect cubes by leaning toward the nearer cube, and use prime factorization for the exact ones.

To master cube roots and exponents with a teacher, explore Bhanzu's algebra tutor, our high school math tutor sessions, or math classes online. Want to work a set live? Book a free demo class.

Read More

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us write better content

Frequently Asked Questions

How many numbers from 1 to 100 are perfect cubes?
Four: 1, 8, 27, and 64. Their cube roots are the whole numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4.
How many cube roots from 1 to 100 are irrational?
Ninety-six. Only the four perfect cubes give rational (whole-number) roots; the rest are irrational.
What is the cube root of 100?
1003≈4.642\sqrt[3]{100} \approx 4.642. It is the largest value on the chart and stays under 5, since 53=1255^3 = 125.
What is the difference between a cube root and a square root?
A square root asks what number squared gives nn; a cube root asks what number cubed gives nn. The cube root carries the index 3 (n3\sqrt[3]{n}) and is defined for negative numbers too.
✍️ Written By
BT
Bhanzu Team
Content Creator and Editor
Bhanzu’s editorial team, known as Team Bhanzu, is made up of experienced educators, curriculum experts, content strategists, and fact-checkers dedicated to making math simple and engaging for learners worldwide. Every article and resource is carefully researched, thoughtfully structured, and rigorously reviewed to ensure accuracy, clarity, and real-world relevance. We understand that building strong math foundations can raise questions for students and parents alike. That’s why Team Bhanzu focuses on delivering practical insights, concept-driven explanations, and trustworthy guidance-empowering learners to develop confidence, speed, and a lifelong love for mathematics.
Related Articles
Book a FREE Demo ClassBook Now →