Why There Is No Single "Area Of A Polygon" Formula
Ask for "the area formula for a polygon" and the honest answer is that there isn't one - there are two different tools, and the wrong one gives nonsense. A regular hexagon and a lopsided five-sided garden plot are both polygons, yet the tidy formula that handles the hexagon collapses on the plot. Knowing which tool a shape calls for is most of the skill.
The area of a polygon is the amount of two-dimensional space enclosed by its sides. The method depends on the polygon's regularity: a regular polygon (all sides and all angles equal) uses the apothem formula $A = \tfrac{1}{2},P,a$, while an irregular polygon is handled either by triangulation (splitting it into triangles and adding their areas) or by the shoelace formula when the corner coordinates are known. A polygon is a closed shape made of straight sides; see polygons for the family, and the apothem for the regular-polygon route.
By the end you will pick the right method on sight, apply the apothem formula to regular shapes, and use both triangulation and the shoelace formula on irregular ones.
Route 1 - Regular Polygons: The Apothem Formula
A regular polygon has all sides equal and all angles equal, which gives it a single centre equidistant from every side. That distance - the apothem $a$ - is the key.
$$A = \frac{1}{2},P,a$$
where $P$ is the perimeter and $a$ is the apothem. The formula comes from cutting the polygon into $n$ identical triangles from the centre: each has base $s$ (a side) and height $a$, so each has area $\tfrac{1}{2}s a$, and $n$ of them total $\tfrac{1}{2}(ns)a = \tfrac{1}{2}Pa$ since $P = ns$.
If you know only the side length $s$ and the number of sides $n$, the apothem is $a = \dfrac{s}{2\tan(180°/n)}$, which gives the side-only form:
$$A = \frac{n,s^2}{4\tan(180°/n)}$$
Here $n$ is the number of sides, $s$ the side length, $P = ns$ the perimeter, and $a$ the apothem. This single formula covers the equilateral triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon, and every regular $n$-gon, once the apothem is known.
Route 2 - Irregular Polygons: Triangulation And The Shoelace Formula
An irregular polygon has no single centre distance, so the apothem formula fails. Two reliable methods handle it.
Triangulation. Pick one vertex and draw diagonals to every non-adjacent vertex. This cuts an $n$-sided polygon into $n - 2$ triangles. Find each triangle's area (base times height over two, or Heron's formula) and add them.
Shoelace formula. When you know the coordinates of the corners $(x_1, y_1), (x_2, y_2), \dots, (x_n, y_n)$ listed in order around the polygon, the area is:
$$A = \frac{1}{2}\left|\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(x_i,y_{i+1} - x_{i+1},y_i\right)\right|$$
where the indices wrap so that $(x_{n+1}, y_{n+1}) = (x_1, y_1)$ - the last vertex connects back to the first. The name comes from the criss-cross multiplication pattern, like lacing a shoe. The absolute value keeps the area positive whichever direction you list the vertices, and the two coordinate lists (down and up) are subtracted. This method connects directly to coordinate geometry and is the general form of the area of a triangle in coordinate geometry.
Examples Of The Area Of Polygons
Six worked cases, from a regular hexagon to a full shoelace computation.
Example 1
Find the area of a regular hexagon with side $6$ cm and apothem $5.2$ cm.
Perimeter $P = 6 \times 6 = 36$ cm. $A = \tfrac{1}{2},P,a = \tfrac{1}{2}(36)(5.2)$. $A = 18 \times 5.2 = 93.6$ cm².
Example 2
Find the area of an irregular quadrilateral plot from its side lengths alone: sides $5, 6, 7, 8$ m.
Wrong path first: multiply "average side" by itself, $\left(\tfrac{5+6+7+8}{4}\right)^2 = 6.5^2 = 42.25$ m², treating it like a square. That is wrong: side lengths alone do not fix an irregular quadrilateral's area — the same four sides can flex into many shapes with different areas. You need more information, such as a diagonal or the coordinates. The lesson: for irregular polygons, sides alone are not enough; you must triangulate with a known diagonal or use coordinates.
Example 3
Find the area of a triangle with vertices $(1, 2)$, $(4, 6)$, $(7, 1)$ using the shoelace formula.
List the vertices in order and wrap back to the first. Down-products: $(1)(6) + (4)(1) + (7)(2) = 6 + 4 + 14 = 24$. Up-products: $(4)(2) + (7)(6) + (1)(1) = 8 + 42 + 1 = 51$. $A = \tfrac{1}{2}|24 - 51| = \tfrac{1}{2}(27) = 13.5$ square units.
Example 4
Find the area of a regular pentagon with side $8$ cm, using the side-only formula.
Use $A = \dfrac{n,s^2}{4\tan(180°/n)}$ with $n = 5$, $s = 8$. $\tan(180°/5) = \tan 36° \approx 0.7265$. $A = \dfrac{5 \times 64}{4 \times 0.7265} = \dfrac{320}{2.906} \approx 110.1$ cm².
Example 5
Find the area of the quadrilateral with vertices $A(1,1)$, $B(4,1)$, $C(5,3)$, $D(2,4)$ by the shoelace formula.
Down-products (each $x_i y_{i+1}$): $(1)(1) + (4)(3) + (5)(4) + (2)(1) = 1 + 12 + 20 + 2 = 35$. Up-products (each $x_{i+1} y_i$): $(4)(1) + (5)(1) + (2)(3) + (1)(4) = 4 + 5 + 6 + 4 = 19$. $A = \tfrac{1}{2}|35 - 19| = \tfrac{1}{2}(16) = 8$ square units.
Example 6
Find the area of an irregular pentagon by triangulation, given it splits into three triangles of areas $12$, $9$, and $15$ cm².
An $n$-sided polygon splits into $n - 2$ triangles from one vertex; a pentagon gives $5 - 2 = 3$ triangles. Add the three triangle areas. $A = 12 + 9 + 15 = 36$ cm². This is the whole idea of triangulation: the polygon's area is exactly the sum of the pieces it decomposes into.
Where polygon Area Earns Its Keep: "Measuring Land That Refuses To Be A Rectangle"
Finding a polygon's area is one of the oldest practical problems in mathematics, and the two routes above trace back to two very different needs.
Historical root - the surveyor's formula. The shoelace formula is also called the surveyor's formula, because land surveyors have long computed the area of an irregular parcel from the measured coordinates of its corner markers. Real plots of land are almost never regular polygons, so the coordinate method is what makes property measurement possible. The formula is credited to Carl Friedrich Gauss and remains the standard tool in modern surveying.
Why two routes exist. Regular polygons have symmetry you can exploit - one apothem does all the work. Irregular polygons have none, so you either break them into pieces you can measure (triangulation) or reduce them to arithmetic on coordinates (shoelace). The choice is dictated by the shape, not by preference.
Where it goes next. Triangulation is the seed of a much bigger idea: any region, even a curved one, can be approximated by many small triangles, and letting the triangles shrink leads to integration and the areas of curved figures. The polygon is where that "sum of pieces" idea first pays off.
That is why polygon area is worth learning as two matched tools: symmetry when you have it, decomposition when you don't.
Common Mistakes When Finding Polygon Area
Mistake 1: Using the regular-polygon formula on an irregular shape
Where it slips in: Any polygon that merely looks even.
Don't do this: Apply $A = \tfrac{1}{2}Pa$ to a plot whose sides are not all equal - an irregular polygon has no single apothem.
The correct way: Confirm the polygon is regular (all sides and all angles equal) before using the apothem formula. If it is not, triangulate or use the shoelace formula. The memoriser who learned "$\tfrac12 Pa$ is the polygon area" applies it to the first uneven field and gets a wrong number.
Mistake 2: Forgetting to wrap the last vertex back to the first in the shoelace formula
Where it slips in: The final term of the sum.
Don't do this: Stop the criss-cross after the last listed vertex, omitting the $x_n y_1 - x_1 y_n$ term that closes the polygon.
The correct way: Always include the wrap-around term connecting the last vertex to the first - the polygon must close. The rusher who drops the closing term leaves the shape open and gets an area that is too small.
Mistake 3: Listing the vertices out of order
Where it slips in: Reading coordinates off a diagram in a scattered order.
The correct way: List the vertices strictly in sequence around the boundary (all clockwise or all counter-clockwise). Jumping between non-adjacent corners produces a self-crossing path, and the shoelace formula gives a wrong (often too-small) area for a self-intersecting outline. The absolute value handles direction, but not scrambled order.
Conclusion
The area of a polygon is the space it encloses, and the method depends on whether the polygon is regular or irregular.
A regular polygon uses $A = \tfrac{1}{2}Pa$, or the side-only form $A = \dfrac{n s^2}{4\tan(180°/n)}$.
An irregular polygon uses triangulation (split into $n - 2$ triangles and add) or the shoelace formula from ordered coordinates.
The shoelace formula must wrap the last vertex to the first, and the vertices must be listed in order around the boundary.
Side lengths alone never determine an irregular polygon's area - you need a diagonal or the coordinates.
To take polygon-area methods further with a teacher, explore Bhanzu's geometry tutor, our middle school math tutor sessions, or math classes online. To watch a trainer run the shoelace formula on a real plot live, you can book a free demo class.
A practical next step
Work through the exercises below. Decide first whether the polygon is regular (apothem formula) or irregular (triangulation or shoelace).
Find the area of a regular octagon with perimeter $48$ cm and apothem $7.2$ cm. (Answer to Question 1: $A = \tfrac12(48)(7.2) = 172.8$ cm².)
Find the area of the triangle with vertices $(0,0), (6,0), (3,4)$ by the shoelace formula. (Answer to Question 2: down $0 + 24 + 0 = 24$, up $0 + 0 + 0 = 0$, $A = \tfrac12|24| = 12$ square units.)
Read More
Types of polygon - regular versus irregular, and by number of sides.
Irregular polygons - shapes with unequal sides and angles, in detail.
Hexagon shape and area - a worked regular-polygon area, six sides.
Area of a circle - the limit a regular polygon's area approaches as sides increase.
Convex polygon - the shape class the shoelace formula assumes when simple.
Geometric shapes - the broader 2-D and 3-D shape family.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us write better content