Evaluating Limits Algebraically: Methods and Examples

#Calculus
TL;DR
Evaluating limits algebraically means rewriting an expression until direct substitution works. This guide covers six techniques, a decision flow for choosing one, worked examples and the mistakes that cost marks.
BT
Bhanzu TeamLast updated on October 9, 202619 min read

What Does Evaluating Limits Algebraically Mean?

Evaluating limits algebraically means finding lim⁡x→af(x)\lim_{x \to a} f(x) by manipulating the formula for f(x)f(x), rather than by reading a graph or building a table of values. The method always starts the same way: substitute x=ax = a. If that gives a real number, you are done. If it gives 00\frac{0}{0}, you rewrite the expression (factor, rationalize, combine fractions, or divide by a power of xx) and substitute again.

Recall what the limit itself says. The notation lim⁡x→af(x)=L\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L means that the outputs f(x)f(x) get as close as you like to LL when xx is close enough to aa, with x≠ax \neq a. A full treatment of that definition lives on the limit of a function page. For this page, one consequence matters more than any other:

If f(x)=g(x) for every x≠a near a, then lim⁡x→af(x)=lim⁡x→ag(x).\text{If } f(x) = g(x) \text{ for every } x \neq a \text{ near } a, \text{ then } \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \lim_{x \to a} g(x).

  • ff is the original expression, often undefined at aa.

  • gg is the rewritten expression, which agrees with ff everywhere near aa except possibly at aa itself.

  • The condition "for every x≠ax \neq a near aa" is the whole licence. The value at aa never enters a limit.

The arithmetic you use along the way (the limit of a sum is the sum of the limits, and so on) comes from the limit laws. This page assumes those laws and focuses on the rewrites.

Why Can You Cancel A Factor When Direct Substitution Gives 0/0?

You can cancel because a limit never looks at x=ax = a itself, and at every other input the cancelled factor is a nonzero number divided by itself. Two Physics Forums threads ask this exact question, "Why does cancellation in limits work like this?" and "Justification for cancelling terms in limits?", and the worry behind both is fair: cancelling (x−3)(x-3) when x=3x = 3 looks like dividing by zero.

Take f(x)=x2−9x−3f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3}. For any x≠3x \neq 3, the factor x−3x - 3 is not zero, so

x2−9x−3=(x−3)(x+3)x−3=x+3(x≠3).\frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3} = \frac{(x - 3)(x + 3)}{x - 3} = x + 3 \quad (x \neq 3).

The two functions f(x)f(x) and g(x)=x+3g(x) = x + 3 are different functions. Their domains differ, since ff is undefined at 33 and gg is not. But they agree at every input except 33, and the limit as x→3x \to 3 only uses inputs near 33, never 33 itself. So the limit of ff equals the limit of gg, which is 66 by plain substitution.

Geometrically, the graph of ff is the line y=x+3y = x + 3 with a single point punched out at (3,6)(3, 6). The algebra fills that hole, and the filled-in height is the limit. A hole like this is a removable discontinuity, and evaluating limits algebraically is how you find where the missing point belongs.

Which Technique Should You Try First?

Substitute first, then let the shape of the expression choose the technique. A Quora question captures the confusion well: "If I am doing limit calculus and the answer I receive is 0/0, when do I use conjugates? When do I claim that the limit does not exist?" The short answer is that 00\frac{0}{0} never means "does not exist". It means "rewrite and try again".

What substitution gives

What the expression looks like

Technique to try

A real number

Anything

Done: that number is the limit

k0\frac{k}{0} with k≠0k \neq 0

Any quotient

No rewrite helps; check signs on each side (the limit is ∞\infty, −∞-\infty or does not exist)

00\frac{0}{0}

Polynomials on top and bottom

Factor and cancel

00\frac{0}{0}

A square root in a difference

Multiply by the conjugate

00\frac{0}{0}

Fractions inside a fraction

Combine over a common denominator

∞∞\frac{\infty}{\infty} as x→∞x \to \infty

A rational or root expression

Divide by the highest power of xx

00\frac{0}{0}

sin⁡\sin, cos⁡\cos or tan⁡\tan of something small

Rewrite toward sin⁡uu→1\frac{\sin u}{u} \to 1

Different behaviour on each side

Absolute value or piecewise rule

Compute both one-sided limits

Run the table top to bottom and stop at the first row that fits. Two cases fall outside it: a bounded, oscillating factor such as x2sin⁡1xx^2 \sin\frac{1}{x}, which needs the squeeze theorem, and a 00\frac{0}{0} quotient that resists every rewrite, where L'Hôpital's rule (differentiating top and bottom separately) is the usual next tool.

How Does Direct Substitution Work?

Direct substitution works whenever the function is continuous at aa: then the limit equals the function value, lim⁡x→af(x)=f(a)\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a). Polynomials are continuous everywhere, and a quotient of polynomials (a rational function) is continuous wherever its denominator is not zero, so for these you simply plug in. The idea that "the value and the limit agree" is exactly what continuity of a function means.

lim⁡x→2(3x2−5x+1)=3(4)−10+1=3\lim_{x \to 2} \left(3x^2 - 5x + 1\right) = 3(4) - 10 + 1 = 3

lim⁡x→1x+4x2+1=52\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x + 4}{x^2 + 1} = \frac{5}{2}

The habit to build is to substitute before you do anything clever. Students who reach for factoring by reflex sometimes spend a page simplifying a limit that substitution answers in one line.

How Do You Evaluate A Limit By Factoring?

When substitution gives 00\frac{0}{0} and both numerator and denominator are polynomials, x−ax - a is a factor of both (by the factor theorem), so factor it out and cancel the common factor. Then substitute again.

lim⁡x→2x2+x−6x−2\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{x^2 + x - 6}{x - 2}

=lim⁡x→2(x−2)(x+3)x−2= \lim_{x \to 2} \frac{(x - 2)(x + 3)}{x - 2}

=lim⁡x→2(x+3)= \lim_{x \to 2} (x + 3)

=5= 5

The factoring patterns you need are the ones from algebra: common factors, trinomials, the difference of squares a2−b2=(a−b)(a+b)a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b), and the difference of cubes a3−b3=(a−b)(a2+ab+b2)a^3 - b^3 = (a - b)(a^2 + ab + b^2). When no pattern is obvious, divide the polynomial by x−ax - a directly. Since x=ax = a makes the numerator zero, the division always comes out exact.

Notice the "lim" stays on every line until the very last one. Writing (x−2)(x+3)x−2=x+3\frac{(x-2)(x+3)}{x-2} = x + 3 without the limit (or without the condition x≠2x \neq 2) is a false statement at x=2x = 2.

How Do You Rationalize To Evaluate A Limit?

When a square root sits in a difference such as x−3\sqrt{x} - 3, multiply the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate x+3\sqrt{x} + 3. The product (x−3)(x+3)=x−9(\sqrt{x} - 3)(\sqrt{x} + 3) = x - 9 has no root left, and the factor that caused the zero becomes visible.

lim⁡x→9x−3x−9\lim_{x \to 9} \frac{\sqrt{x} - 3}{x - 9}

=lim⁡x→9(x−3)(x+3)(x−9)(x+3)= \lim_{x \to 9} \frac{(\sqrt{x} - 3)(\sqrt{x} + 3)}{(x - 9)(\sqrt{x} + 3)}

=lim⁡x→9x−9(x−9)(x+3)= \lim_{x \to 9} \frac{x - 9}{(x - 9)(\sqrt{x} + 3)}

=lim⁡x→91x+3=16= \lim_{x \to 9} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x} + 3} = \frac{1}{6}

A tutor on Physics Forums ("The Conjugate Method for Limits") tried this on f(x)x−3\frac{f(x)}{x - 3} by multiplying by x+3x + 3 and found the denominator still went to zero. That is the right observation.

The conjugate method only helps when the zero comes from a difference of square roots: the conjugate turns that difference into a polynomial that shares a factor with the other side. Multiplying a plain x−3x - 3 by x+3x + 3 creates no common factor, so nothing cancels. Use the conjugate on the part that contains the root, whether it sits on top or on the bottom.

How Do You Simplify Complex Fractions In A Limit?

When the expression has fractions inside a fraction, combine the small fractions over a common denominator first. The factor x−ax - a usually appears in the new numerator and cancels.

lim⁡x→01x+2−12x\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\frac{1}{x + 2} - \frac{1}{2}}{x}

=lim⁡x→02−(x+2)2(x+2)x= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\frac{2 - (x + 2)}{2(x + 2)}}{x}

=lim⁡x→0−x2x(x+2)= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{-x}{2x(x + 2)}

=lim⁡x→0−12(x+2)=−14= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{-1}{2(x + 2)} = -\frac{1}{4}

The tempting shortcut is to split the fraction into 1x(x+2)−12x\frac{1}{x(x+2)} - \frac{1}{2x} and take each limit separately. Each piece blows up as x→0x \to 0, which hands you ∞−∞\infty - \infty, another indeterminate form. Combining first avoids the trap entirely.

How Do You Evaluate Limits At Infinity By Dividing By The Highest Power?

As x→∞x \to \infty, divide every term in the numerator and denominator by the highest power of xx in the denominator. Every term of the form cxn\frac{c}{x^n} (with n>0n > 0) then goes to 00, and what remains is a plain number.

lim⁡x→∞2x2−3x+15x2+4\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{2x^2 - 3x + 1}{5x^2 + 4}

=lim⁡x→∞2−3x+1x25+4x2= \lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{2 - \frac{3}{x} + \frac{1}{x^2}}{5 + \frac{4}{x^2}}

=2−0+05+0=25= \frac{2 - 0 + 0}{5 + 0} = \frac{2}{5}

The same move gives the three standard outcomes for a rational function, which the limits at infinity page develops in detail:

  • Same degree on top and bottom: the limit is the ratio of the leading coefficients, as above.

  • Lower degree on top: the limit is 00, for example lim⁡x→∞3x+1x2+5=0\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{3x + 1}{x^2 + 5} = 0.

  • Higher degree on top: the expression grows without bound, for example x3x2+1→∞\frac{x^3}{x^2 + 1} \to \infty.

Square roots need one extra line of care. For x<0x < 0, x2=∣x∣=−x\sqrt{x^2} = |x| = -x, not xx. That sign is the whole difference in Example 5 below.

How Do You Evaluate Trigonometric Limits Algebraically?

Trigonometric limits are evaluated by rewriting the expression so it contains sin⁡uu\frac{\sin u}{u} with u→0u \to 0, then using the two standard results below. They are proved geometrically with the squeeze theorem, and the standard limits page collects the rest of the family.

lim⁡u→0sin⁡uu=1lim⁡u→01−cos⁡uu=0\lim_{u \to 0} \frac{\sin u}{u} = 1 \qquad \lim_{u \to 0} \frac{1 - \cos u}{u} = 0

Both require uu in radians. The usual move is to multiply and divide by whatever makes the argument and the denominator match:

lim⁡x→0sin⁡5xx=lim⁡x→05⋅sin⁡5x5x=5⋅1=5\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin 5x}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0} 5 \cdot \frac{\sin 5x}{5x} = 5 \cdot 1 = 5

For a ratio of two sines, create two copies of the standard limit:

lim⁡x→0sin⁡5xsin⁡2x=lim⁡x→0sin⁡5x5x⋅5xsin⁡2x2x⋅2x=52\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin 5x}{\sin 2x} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\frac{\sin 5x}{5x} \cdot 5x}{\frac{\sin 2x}{2x} \cdot 2x} = \frac{5}{2}

And tan⁡x=sin⁡xcos⁡x\tan x = \frac{\sin x}{\cos x} gives lim⁡x→0tan⁡xx=lim⁡x→0sin⁡xx⋅1cos⁡x=1\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\tan x}{x} = \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} \cdot \frac{1}{\cos x} = 1.

How Do You Find One-Sided Limits Algebraically?

You find a one-sided limit algebraically by replacing the absolute value or the piecewise rule with the formula that holds on that side, then substituting. Quora users ask "How do I find one-sided limits algebraically?", and the answer is that the side you approach from tells you which formula to use.

For ∣x−2∣x−2\frac{|x - 2|}{x - 2}, the absolute value function splits into two cases. When x>2x > 2, ∣x−2∣=x−2|x - 2| = x - 2, and when x<2x < 2, ∣x−2∣=−(x−2)|x - 2| = -(x - 2):

lim⁡x→2+∣x−2∣x−2=lim⁡x→2+x−2x−2=1\lim_{x \to 2^{+}} \frac{|x - 2|}{x - 2} = \lim_{x \to 2^{+}} \frac{x - 2}{x - 2} = 1

lim⁡x→2−∣x−2∣x−2=lim⁡x→2−−(x−2)x−2=−1\lim_{x \to 2^{-}} \frac{|x - 2|}{x - 2} = \lim_{x \to 2^{-}} \frac{-(x - 2)}{x - 2} = -1

The one-sided limits disagree, so the two-sided limit does not exist. Piecewise functions work the same way. For f(x)=x2+1f(x) = x^2 + 1 when x<1x < 1 and f(x)=3x−1f(x) = 3x - 1 when x≥1x \geq 1, the left formula gives 22 and the right formula gives 22, so lim⁡x→1f(x)=2\lim_{x \to 1} f(x) = 2.

When Does Algebra Show That A Limit Does Not Exist?

Algebra shows a limit does not exist when substitution gives k0\frac{k}{0} with k≠0k \neq 0 and the two sides head in different directions, or when the one-sided limits disagree. The key distinction is between 00\frac{0}{0}, which is one of the indeterminate forms and tells you nothing yet, and k0\frac{k}{0}, which is not indeterminate at all.

With k0\frac{k}{0}, the size of the expression grows without bound, so only the sign is left to decide:

  • lim⁡x→11(x−1)2=∞\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{1}{(x - 1)^2} = \infty, because the denominator is positive on both sides.

  • lim⁡x→1x+1x−1\lim_{x \to 1} \frac{x + 1}{x - 1} does not exist: the right-hand limit is ∞\infty and the left-hand limit is −∞-\infty.

So the honest workflow is: 00\frac{0}{0} means rewrite, k0\frac{k}{0} means check signs, and only disagreeing sides (or unbounded behaviour) justify "does not exist".

Examples Of Evaluating Limits Algebraically

Example 1

Evaluate lim⁡x→3x2+2x−1x+1\lim_{x \to 3} \dfrac{x^2 + 2x - 1}{x + 1}.

Substitute x=3x = 3. The denominator is 44, not zero, so the function is continuous at 33.

9+6−13+1=144=72\frac{9 + 6 - 1}{3 + 1} = \frac{14}{4} = \frac{7}{2}

Final answer: 72\frac{7}{2}

Example 2

Evaluate lim⁡x→2x3−8x−2\lim_{x \to 2} \dfrac{x^3 - 8}{x - 2}.

Substitution gives 8−82−2=00\frac{8 - 8}{2 - 2} = \frac{0}{0}. A tempting conclusion is that "anything over itself is 11", so the limit is 11.

Check that against nearby inputs:

xx

1.91.9

1.9991.999

2.0012.001

2.12.1

x3−8x−2\frac{x^3 - 8}{x - 2}

11.4111.41

11.99411.994

12.00612.006

12.6112.61

The values settle near 1212, nowhere near 11. The zero on top and the zero on the bottom shrink at different rates, and 00\frac{0}{0} carries no information about that ratio. Factor instead, using the difference of cubes:

lim⁡x→2(x−2)(x2+2x+4)x−2\lim_{x \to 2} \frac{(x - 2)(x^2 + 2x + 4)}{x - 2}

=lim⁡x→2(x2+2x+4)= \lim_{x \to 2} (x^2 + 2x + 4)

=4+4+4=12= 4 + 4 + 4 = 12

Final answer: 1212

Example 3

Evaluate lim⁡x→0x+4−2x\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{\sqrt{x + 4} - 2}{x}.

Substitution gives 00\frac{0}{0}, and the zero comes from a root difference, so multiply by the conjugate x+4+2\sqrt{x + 4} + 2.

lim⁡x→0(x+4−2)(x+4+2)x(x+4+2)\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(\sqrt{x + 4} - 2)(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)}{x(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)}

=lim⁡x→0(x+4)−4x(x+4+2)= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(x + 4) - 4}{x(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)}

=lim⁡x→01x+4+2= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2}

=12+2=14= \frac{1}{2 + 2} = \frac{1}{4}

Check: at x=0.001x = 0.001 the original expression is about 0.249980.24998.

Final answer: 14\frac{1}{4}

Example 4

Evaluate lim⁡x→31x−13x−3\lim_{x \to 3} \dfrac{\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{3}}{x - 3}.

Combine the top over the common denominator 3x3x.

1x−13=3−x3x=−(x−3)3x\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{3} = \frac{3 - x}{3x} = \frac{-(x - 3)}{3x}

lim⁡x→3−(x−3)3x(x−3)\lim_{x \to 3} \frac{-(x - 3)}{3x(x - 3)}

=lim⁡x→3−13x= \lim_{x \to 3} \frac{-1}{3x}

=−19= -\frac{1}{9}

This limit is the slope of the tangent to y=1xy = \frac{1}{x} at x=3x = 3, a first glimpse of a derivative.

Final answer: −19-\frac{1}{9}

Example 5

Evaluate lim⁡x→−∞3xx2+1\lim_{x \to -\infty} \dfrac{3x}{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}}.

Divide top and bottom by ∣x∣|x|, the size of the highest power under the root. For x<0x < 0, ∣x∣=−x|x| = -x and x2=−x\sqrt{x^2} = -x.

3xx2+1=3x−xx2+1x2=−31+1x2\frac{3x}{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}} = \frac{\frac{3x}{-x}}{\frac{\sqrt{x^2 + 1}}{\sqrt{x^2}}} = \frac{-3}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{x^2}}}

lim⁡x→−∞−31+1x2=−31+0=−3\lim_{x \to -\infty} \frac{-3}{\sqrt{1 + \frac{1}{x^2}}} = \frac{-3}{\sqrt{1 + 0}} = -3

The sign makes sense: the numerator is negative and the denominator is positive, so the quotient must be negative.

Final answer: −3-3

Example 6

Evaluate lim⁡x→01−cos⁡xx2\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{1 - \cos x}{x^2}.

Substitution gives 00\frac{0}{0}. Multiply by the conjugate 1+cos⁡x1 + \cos x and use 1−cos⁡2x=sin⁡2x1 - \cos^2 x = \sin^2 x.

lim⁡x→0(1−cos⁡x)(1+cos⁡x)x2(1+cos⁡x)\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{(1 - \cos x)(1 + \cos x)}{x^2(1 + \cos x)}

=lim⁡x→0sin⁡2xx2(1+cos⁡x)= \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin^2 x}{x^2(1 + \cos x)}

=lim⁡x→0(sin⁡xx)2⋅11+cos⁡x= \lim_{x \to 0} \left(\frac{\sin x}{x}\right)^2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 + \cos x}

=12⋅12=12= 1^2 \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{1}{2}

Final answer: 12\frac{1}{2}

Why Did Mathematicians Need A Rule For Cancelling?

Mathematicians needed it because early calculus cancelled a quantity and then set it to zero, and nobody could say why that was legal. George Berkeley's question in The Analyst (1734) still names the problem better than any textbook: "May we not call them ghosts of departed quantities?"

The story runs in three steps:

  • The objection. Newton's method for a rate of change divided by a small increment and then let the increment vanish. George Berkeley (1685 to 1753, Ireland) pointed out that the increment was treated as nonzero while dividing and as zero afterwards. MacTutor notes that his criticisms were well founded and pushed mathematicians toward a logical clarification of calculus.

  • The repair. Augustin-Louis Cauchy (1789 to 1857, France) wrote the Cours d'analyse in 1821 for students at the École Polytechnique, building the basic theorems of calculus on limits as rigorously as he could.

  • The final form. Karl Weierstrass (1815 to 1897, Germany) and his school later turned "as close as you like" into the epsilon and delta inequalities used today, which is precisely what makes the cancellation rule on this page a theorem rather than a hope.

That is where this page leads. The limit definition of derivative is one big 00\frac{0}{0} limit, and every first-principles derivative is evaluated with exactly the factoring, conjugate and common-denominator moves above (Example 4 already computed one).

Where Are Algebraic Limit Techniques Used In Real Life?

Algebraic limits are used wherever a quantity is defined at an instant or at a single point where the formula breaks:

  • Instantaneous speed. A dropped stone falls s(t)=4.9t2s(t) = 4.9t^2 metres in tt seconds. Its speed at t=2t = 2 is lim⁡h→04.9(2+h)2−4.9(4)h=lim⁡h→0(19.6+4.9h)=19.6,m/s\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{4.9(2 + h)^2 - 4.9(4)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} (19.6 + 4.9h) = 19.6,\text{m/s} after factoring out hh. This is the derivative as rate of change, computed with nothing more than this page's algebra.

  • Signal processing. The function sin⁡xx\frac{\sin x}{x} (called sinc) describes how filters and antennas respond. It is undefined at x=0x = 0, and engineers fill that point with the limit value 11.

  • Economics. Marginal cost is the limit of the extra cost per extra unit as the change in units shrinks, the same 00\frac{0}{0} structure.

  • Asymptotic behaviour. Dividing by the highest power tells an engineer the long-run level of a response such as 2t2−3t+15t2+4\frac{2t^2 - 3t + 1}{5t^2 + 4}, without plotting it.

The Mistakes Students Make Most Often

Most errors in evaluating limits algebraically come from treating 00\frac{0}{0} as an answer, or from dropping the condition x≠ax \neq a that makes the rewrite legal.

Mistake 1: Treating 0/0 As An Answer

Where it slips in: Right after the first substitution, when the result looks finished.

Don't do this: Write 00=1\frac{0}{0} = 1, 00=0\frac{0}{0} = 0, or "the limit does not exist" and stop.

The correct way: Read 00\frac{0}{0} as a signal to rewrite. The rusher writes "DNE" here and moves on, which is why Example 2 shows the table: the true value was 1212.

Mistake 2: Cancelling Terms Instead Of Factors

Where it slips in: Rational expressions such as x2+x−6x−2\frac{x^2 + x - 6}{x - 2}, where xx appears on both lines.

Don't do this: Cross out the xx in x−2x - 2 against an xx in the numerator. Only whole factors cancel, never pieces of a sum.

The correct way: Factor completely first, then cancel a common factor such as (x−2)(x - 2). The first instinct with a fraction like this is to "simplify" by striking matching letters, and factoring before cancelling is the habit that removes that error.

Mistake 3: Losing The Sign With Square Roots At Negative Infinity

Where it slips in: Limits as x→−∞x \to -\infty that contain x2+…\sqrt{x^2 + \ldots}.

Don't do this: Replace x2\sqrt{x^2} with xx. That gives 33 instead of −3-3 in Example 5.

The correct way: Use x2=∣x∣\sqrt{x^2} = |x|, which equals −x-x for negative xx. The memorizer who learned "divide by the highest power" as a rule, without the reason, applies it perfectly and still gets the sign wrong here.

Mistake 4: Splitting A Limit Into Pieces That Do Not Exist

Where it slips in: Complex fractions and differences, such as 1x(x+2)−12x\frac{1}{x(x+2)} - \frac{1}{2x}.

Don't do this: Apply the limit law for a difference when the separate limits are infinite.

The correct way: Combine first. The limit laws only apply when each separate limit exists as a real number.

Wait, one refinement on Mistake 1: "does not exist" is sometimes the correct final answer, as the absolute value example showed. The error is reaching it from 00\frac{0}{0} alone, before any rewrite.

The software version of Mistake 1 has happened at sea. On 21 September 1997, a crew member on the USS Yorktown entered a zero into a database field, the ship's software attempted a division by zero, and the failure brought down the network and left the cruiser without propulsion. A program that met 00\frac{0}{0} and stopped had no way to recover; a mathematician who meets it rewrites the expression.

Practice Problems On Evaluating Limits Algebraically

  1. Evaluate lim⁡x→4x2−16x−4\lim_{x \to 4} \dfrac{x^2 - 16}{x - 4}.

  2. Evaluate lim⁡x→1x3−1x2−1\lim_{x \to 1} \dfrac{x^3 - 1}{x^2 - 1}.

  3. Evaluate lim⁡x→01+x−1−xx\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{\sqrt{1 + x} - \sqrt{1 - x}}{x}.

  4. Evaluate lim⁡x→∞4x3−x2x3+7x2\lim_{x \to \infty} \dfrac{4x^3 - x}{2x^3 + 7x^2}.

  5. Evaluate lim⁡x→0sin⁡4xtan⁡2x\lim_{x \to 0} \dfrac{\sin 4x}{\tan 2x}.

  6. Evaluate lim⁡x→−11x+2−1x+1\lim_{x \to -1} \dfrac{\frac{1}{x + 2} - 1}{x + 1}.

Answer to Question 1: 88 (difference of squares, then x+4x + 4 at x=4x = 4).

Answer to Question 2: 32\frac{3}{2} (factor both: x2+x+1x+1\frac{x^2 + x + 1}{x + 1} at x=1x = 1).

Answer to Question 3: 11 (conjugate gives 21+x+1−x\frac{2}{\sqrt{1 + x} + \sqrt{1 - x}}).

Answer to Question 4: 22 (same degree, ratio of leading coefficients).

Answer to Question 5: 22 (write as sin⁡4x4x⋅2xsin⁡2x⋅cos⁡2x⋅2\frac{\sin 4x}{4x} \cdot \frac{2x}{\sin 2x} \cdot \cos 2x \cdot 2).

Answer to Question 6: −1-1 (common denominator gives −1x+2\frac{-1}{x + 2}).

What To Remember About Evaluating Limits Algebraically

  • Evaluating limits algebraically always starts with direct substitution, and a real-number result is the answer.

  • A 00\frac{0}{0} result means rewrite, while k0\frac{k}{0} means check the sign on each side.

  • Factoring, conjugates, common denominators, dividing by the highest power and the sin⁡uu\frac{\sin u}{u} limit cover most first-course problems.

  • Cancelling is legal because a limit ignores the single input x=ax = a.

  • Keep "lim" on every line, cancel factors only, and remember x2=∣x∣\sqrt{x^2} = |x|.

Where To Go From Here

Work through Practice Problems 1 to 6 in order. If Problem 3 trips you up, return to "How Do You Rationalize To Evaluate A Limit?"; if Problem 4 does, reread the section on dividing by the highest power and check Example 5 for the sign rule.

Want a teacher to walk through the next set with you? Book a free demo class with a Bhanzu trainer.

Read More

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us write better content

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is plugging in a valid way to evaluate a limit?
Because the functions you meet in a first course are continuous wherever they are defined, and continuity at aa means exactly that lim⁡x→af(x)=f(a)\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a). Plugging in is not a shortcut around the definition. It is what the definition gives for continuous functions.
Can the conjugate method handle a square root in the denominator?
Yes. Multiply top and bottom by the conjugate of the denominator instead. For x−4x−2\frac{x - 4}{\sqrt{x} - 2}, the conjugate x+2\sqrt{x} + 2 turns the bottom into x−4x - 4, which cancels, and the limit as x→4x \to 4 is 44.
What does it mean when a limit does not exist?
It means no single number LL works from both sides: the one-sided limits disagree, the values grow without bound, or they keep oscillating.
Can L'Hôpital's rule replace evaluating limits algebraically?
Sometimes. It applies only to 00\frac{0}{0} and ∞∞\frac{\infty}{\infty} quotients of differentiable functions, and the algebra on this page is often faster and less error-prone. It also cannot prove lim⁡x→0sin⁡xx=1\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{\sin x}{x} = 1 without circular reasoning, since differentiating sin⁡x\sin x already uses that limit.
What if evaluating limits algebraically still leaves an indeterminate form?
Try a second technique (some limits need a conjugate and then a factor), the squeeze theorem for bounded oscillation, or a series expansion. If none fits, L'Hôpital's rule is the standard next step.
Is 0 divided by a nonzero number an indeterminate form?
No. A form like 0−2\frac{0}{-2} is just 00. Only 00\frac{0}{0} (and its relatives such as ∞∞\frac{\infty}{\infty}) is indeterminate, because only there can the true limit be any value at all.
✍️ Written By
BT
Bhanzu Team
Content Creator and Editor
Bhanzu’s editorial team, known as Team Bhanzu, is made up of experienced educators, curriculum experts, content strategists, and fact-checkers dedicated to making math simple and engaging for learners worldwide. Every article and resource is carefully researched, thoughtfully structured, and rigorously reviewed to ensure accuracy, clarity, and real-world relevance. We understand that building strong math foundations can raise questions for students and parents alike. That’s why Team Bhanzu focuses on delivering practical insights, concept-driven explanations, and trustworthy guidance-empowering learners to develop confidence, speed, and a lifelong love for mathematics.
Related Articles
Book a FREE Demo ClassBook Now →