— irrational, non-terminating, non-repeating. The simplified radical form is the answer most algebra textbooks expect; the decimal is what a calculator returns.
Result:
Notation: Simplified radical form ; decimal approximation (4 d.p.).
Method shown: Prime factorization (Quick), repeated subtraction with a Wrong-Path-First detour (Standard), long division (Stretch).
Approximate value: (14 d.p.).
Exact form: — cannot be simplified further, since is prime.
Quick Reference Table — Square Roots Near 20
(exact form) | (4 d.p.) | Nearest perfect square | |
|---|---|---|---|
(itself) | |||
(itself) | |||
sits between and — closer to because is away from and away from .
Where √20 shows up
appears as the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs and — by Pythagoras, . The same value is the distance from to on a coordinate plane. The golden ratio's defining equation, , hides inside it — and is just twice that constant.
What "square root of 20" means
The square root of a non-negative number is the value such that . For , the positive with . Because and , lives between and .
The simplified-radical form extracts the perfect-square factor (the ) from inside and leaves the rest under the radical. The decimal comes from numerically approximating the irrational that remains.
Is √20 rational or irrational?
is irrational. A number is a perfect square if and only if every prime in its factorisation appears to an even power. — the pairs into , but the stands alone with exponent . That lone is the reason doesn't collapse to an integer.
The decimal neither terminates nor repeats. Even the simplified form carries that irrationality — itself is irrational, and a rational () times an irrational stays irrational.
How to find √20 — three methods
Method 1 — Prime factorization (Quick)
Factor into primes, then pull out the pair.
The pair of s leaves the radical as a single :
Final answer: .
This is the method every algebra problem expects when it says "express in simplified radical form."
Method 2 — Repeated subtraction (Standard, with a Wrong-Path-First detour)
A common student instinct: try subtracting consecutive odd numbers from . That trick works on perfect squares — let us run it and watch what happens.
Start at . Subtract: , , , , . The fourth subtraction left , and the fifth overshoots into the negatives. The remainder never lands on zero.
Hold on — that overshoot is the diagnosis, not a failure. The method only lands at zero when is a perfect square. isn't one. After step four, we know is between and , which already matches the table. The rescue is to switch to prime factorization for the simplified form, or long division for the decimal.
Final answer (radical): .
The second-guesser archetype hits this method hardest — they get to step five, see the negative, and assume they made an arithmetic mistake. They didn't. They proved isn't a perfect square.
Method 3 — Long division (Stretch)
For a decimal approximation, run the long-division algorithm on .
Step 1. Largest integer with square is (). Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 2. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 3. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 4. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Continuing produces to four decimals.
Final answer: .
Slip-ups that cost marks on √20
1. Pulling all the prime factors out, not just the pairs
Where it slips in: A student factors and pulls every factor out: .
Don't do this: .
The correct way: Only the paired factors leave the radical, and each pair leaves as a single number — not as both members of the pair. The pair of s becomes a single outside; the unpaired stays under. So .
2. Reading "simplify" as "evaluate"
Where it slips in: A test question says "express in simplest radical form." The student writes .
Don't do this: — submitted as the final answer when the question asked for radical form.
The correct way: . The decimal is an approximation that loses information; is exact. Always read the question's verb — "simplify" wants the radical, "evaluate" or "approximate" wants the decimal.
3. Multiplying instead of squaring when checking.
Where it slips in: A student answers and checks by multiplying — which is not — but doesn't recognise the mismatch as a sign their answer is wrong.
Don't do this: Skip the check, or run the check and shrug at the wrong number.
The correct way: After every square-root answer, square it back. If the result isn't the original number, the answer is wrong. — the check works. This is the habit a Bhanzu Grade 9 trainer drills in the first week of the radicals unit: every answer gets squared back before it leaves the page. About four out of every ten students fix their own error in the squaring-back step before the trainer ever sees it.
Conclusion
The square root of 20 is in simplified radical form and as a decimal.
is irrational; the unpaired prime blocks an integer answer.
Three methods reach : prime factorization (one line), repeated subtraction (proves irrationality), long division (gives the decimal).
Only paired prime factors leave a radical, and they leave as a single copy — not as both.
Every square-root answer should be squared back to confirm — .
A practical next step
Simplify using prime factorization. (Answer should be .)
Compute to two decimal places by long division without copying the worked example.
Find the distance from to on a coordinate plane in exact and decimal form.
Want a live Bhanzu trainer to walk through more radical-simplification problems? Book a free demo class — online globally.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us write better content

