The Answer At A Glance
Result:
Notation: Decimal approximation; exact form is .
Method shown: Long division method (manual), with cross-checks using Newton's method and linear interpolation.
Approximate value: (4 d.p.)
Exact form: — cannot be simplified, since has no square factor.
Quick Reference Table — Square Roots Near 85
(exact) | (4 d.p.) | |
|---|---|---|
Between and , sits closer to the lower end at . Only and in this band have integer square roots.
What "Square Root of 85" Means
The square root of a non-negative number is the value such that . For , that means the positive number for which .
Because and , falls between and — closer to than to because is closer to .
Is √85 Rational or Irrational?
is irrational. Reason: . Neither nor is a perfect square, and a number is a perfect square if and only if every prime in its factorisation appears to an even power. Since both and appear to the first power, is not a perfect square, and its square root cannot be written as a fraction .
The decimal neither terminates nor repeats — the definition of irrational.
How To Find √85 — Three Methods
Method 1 — Long division (digit by digit)
Pair the digits of : .
Step 1. Largest integer with square is (). Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 2. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 3. Double : . Find with . gives . Subtract: . Bring down : .
Step 4. Double : . gives . Subtract.
After four steps: . Continuing gives .
Final answer: .
Method 2 — Newton's iteration (fastest)
Start .
Two iterations to four-decimal precision. Newton doubles the correct digits each step.
Method 3 — Linear interpolation (mental estimate)
Quick enough for a sanity check.
Where √85 Shows Up
appears as the diagonal of a rectangle — Pythagoras gives . It also turns up in the distance between and : . In surveying and navigation, irrational roots of the form are routine — is one of the small ones that arise on integer-grid coordinates.
Three Slips That Cost Marks on √85
Mistake 1: Trying to simplify when no square factor exists.
Where it slips in: Students assume every non-perfect-square integer simplifies to .
Don't do this: → "simplifies to" something cleaner.
The correct way: Check whether the radicand has a perfect-square factor other than . — no square factor. is already in simplest radical form.
In Bhanzu's Grade 8 cohorts, the "must simplify" reflex shows up on roughly four out of ten first attempts at — students try to force a factorisation that does not exist.
Mistake 2: Reporting a truncated decimal as exact.
Don't do this: .
The correct way: (4 d.p.). The exact value is — irrational decimals never terminate.
Mistake 3: Confusing with .
Where it slips in: Solving .
Don't do this: (only).
The correct way: . Both square to . The notation alone refers to the positive root. A Bhanzu trainer at the McKinney TX center keeps the habit on the side board for the first month of root work — the dropped negative is the single most common slip.
Conclusion
The square root of 85 is approximately — irrational, non-terminating, non-repeating.
has no perfect-square factor, so cannot be simplified.
Three methods compute it: long division, Newton's iteration (fastest), and linear interpolation (quickest mental estimate).
Always use for irrational decimal approximations.
shows up as the diagonal of a rectangle and in standard distance-formula calculations.
A practical next step
Find to two decimal places using Newton's method starting from .
Is rational or irrational? Justify by prime factorisation.
The diagonal of a rectangle is cm and one side is cm. Find the other side.
Want a Bhanzu trainer to walk you through more square-root problems? Book a free demo class — online globally.
Was this article helpful?
Your feedback helps us write better content

