Adjoint of a Matrix - Formula, Steps, Examples

#Algebra
TL;DR
The adjoint of a matrix AA (also called adjugate) is the transpose of the cofactor matrix. It's the bridge that connects the matrix to its inverse: A−1=1det⁡(A)adj⁡(A)A^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{\det(A)} \operatorname{adj}(A).
MV
Madhukar VLast updated on May 19, 20266 min read

What Is the Adjoint of a Matrix?

The adjoint of a square matrix AA — written adj⁡(A)\operatorname{adj}(A) — is defined as the transpose of the matrix of cofactors.

Two preliminary definitions you need:

  • Minor MijM_{ij} of an entry: the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row ii and column jj.

  • Cofactor CijC_{ij} of an entry: Cij=(−1)i+jMijC_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j} M_{ij} — the minor with a checkerboard-pattern sign.

The cofactor matrix is the matrix of all CijC_{ij}. The adjoint is its transpose:

adj⁡(A)=(Cij)T=(Cji)\operatorname{adj}(A) = (C_{ij})^T = (C_{ji})

The Connection to the Inverse

The adjoint exists for the sake of computing the inverse:

A−1=1det⁡(A)adj⁡(A)A^{-1} = \frac{1}{\det(A)} \operatorname{adj}(A)

This works whenever det⁡(A)≠0\det(A) \neq 0. For singular matrices (det⁡=0\det = 0), the adjoint still exists, but division by zero makes the inverse undefined.

Adjoint of a 2×2 Matrix

For A=(ab cd)A = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d \end{pmatrix}:

adj⁡(A)=(d−b −ca)\operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} d & -b \ -c & a \end{pmatrix}

The pattern: swap the diagonal, negate the off-diagonal. This is exactly what the inverse formula does (before dividing by the determinant).

Worked example. Find the adjoint of A=(35 24)A = \begin{pmatrix} 3 & 5 \ 2 & 4 \end{pmatrix}.

adj⁡(A)=(4−5 −23)\operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} 4 & -5 \ -2 & 3 \end{pmatrix}

Verify the inverse formula: det⁡(A)=12−10=2\det(A) = 12 - 10 = 2, so A−1=12(4−5 −23)A^{-1} = \tfrac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} 4 & -5 \ -2 & 3 \end{pmatrix}, which matches the standard 2×22 \times 2 inverse formula.

Adjoint of a 3×3 Matrix

For a 3×33 \times 3 matrix, the calculation is more involved but follows the same recipe.

For A=(a11a12a13 a21a22a23 a31a32a33)A = \begin{pmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & a_{13} \ a_{21} & a_{22} & a_{23} \ a_{31} & a_{32} & a_{33} \end{pmatrix}:

Compute the cofactor of each entry:

Cij=(−1)i+jdet⁡[2x2 submatrix obtained by deleting row i,column j]C_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j} \det\bigl[\text{2x2 submatrix obtained by deleting row } i, \text{column } j\bigr]

The cofactor matrix is (Cij)3×3(C_{ij})_{3 \times 3}. The adjoint is its transpose.

Step-by-step for 3×3.

  1. For each entry, compute its 2×22 \times 2 minor (determinant of the submatrix).

  2. Apply the sign pattern (−1)i+j(-1)^{i+j} — checkerboard with ++ in position (1,1)(1,1).

  3. Form the cofactor matrix.

  4. Transpose: swap entries across the main diagonal.

Three Worked Examples — Quick, Standard, Stretch

Quick — 2×2 Adjoint

Find the adjoint of A=(47 26)A = \begin{pmatrix} 4 & 7 \ 2 & 6 \end{pmatrix}.

adj⁡(A)=(6−7 −24)\operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} 6 & -7 \ -2 & 4 \end{pmatrix}

Standard — 3×3 Adjoint

Find the adjoint of A=(123 014 560)A = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \ 0 & 1 & 4 \ 5 & 6 & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

Compute cofactors (showing key ones):

  • C11=+det⁡(14 60)=0−24=−24C_{11} = +\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 4 \ 6 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = 0 - 24 = -24

  • C12=−det⁡(04 50)=−(0−20)=20C_{12} = -\det\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 4 \ 5 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = -(0 - 20) = 20

  • C13=+det⁡(01 56)=0−5=−5C_{13} = +\det\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \ 5 & 6 \end{pmatrix} = 0 - 5 = -5

  • C21=−det⁡(23 60)=−(0−18)=18C_{21} = -\det\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 3 \ 6 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = -(0 - 18) = 18

  • C22=+det⁡(13 50)=0−15=−15C_{22} = +\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 3 \ 5 & 0 \end{pmatrix} = 0 - 15 = -15

  • C23=−det⁡(12 56)=−(6−10)=4C_{23} = -\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \ 5 & 6 \end{pmatrix} = -(6 - 10) = 4

  • C31=+det⁡(23 14)=8−3=5C_{31} = +\det\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 3 \ 1 & 4 \end{pmatrix} = 8 - 3 = 5

  • C32=−det⁡(13 04)=−(4−0)=−4C_{32} = -\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 3 \ 0 & 4 \end{pmatrix} = -(4 - 0) = -4

  • C33=+det⁡(12 01)=1−0=1C_{33} = +\det\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 \ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} = 1 - 0 = 1

Cofactor matrix: C=(−2420−5 18−154 5−41)C = \begin{pmatrix} -24 & 20 & -5 \ 18 & -15 & 4 \ 5 & -4 & 1 \end{pmatrix}

Adjoint = transpose: adj⁡(A)=(−24185 20−15−4 −541)\operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} -24 & 18 & 5 \ 20 & -15 & -4 \ -5 & 4 & 1 \end{pmatrix}

Stretch — Use Adjoint to Find Inverse

Using the 3×3 result above, find A−1A^{-1}.

First compute det⁡(A)\det(A) by expanding along the first row:

det⁡(A)=1⋅C11+2⋅C12+3⋅C13\det(A) = 1 \cdot C_{11} + 2 \cdot C_{12} + 3 \cdot C_{13}

Note: the original cofactors are signed already.

det⁡(A)=1(−24)+2(20)+3(−5)=−24+40−15=1\det(A) = 1(-24) + 2(20) + 3(-5) = -24 + 40 - 15 = 1

So A−1=11adj⁡(A)=adj⁡(A)=(−24185 20−15−4 −541)A^{-1} = \tfrac{1}{1} \operatorname{adj}(A) = \operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} -24 & 18 & 5 \ 20 & -15 & -4 \ -5 & 4 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.

Why Does the Adjoint Matter? (The Real-World GROUND)

"The adjoint is the bridge between the determinant and the inverse." — linear-algebra heuristic.

The adjoint is not the fastest practical way to compute an inverse for large matrices — Gaussian elimination is faster for matrices larger than 3×33 \times 3. But for small matrices and for theoretical work, the adjoint is essential:

  • Closed-form inverse for 2×2 and 3×3. Matrices that appear in computer graphics rotations, physics linear transformations, and statistics covariance matrices are often this size, and the adjoint gives a clean formula.

  • Cramer's rule. For solving Ax⃗=b⃗A\vec{x} = \vec{b}, Cramer's rule expresses each unknown as a ratio of determinants — directly using cofactors and adjoint logic.

  • Theoretical proofs. The adjoint is central to proving properties of determinants, eigenvalues, and the relationship between AA and A−1A^{-1}.

  • Symbolic algebra systems. Software like Mathematica and SymPy use adjoint-based formulas for symbolic matrix inversion where Gaussian elimination would produce messy intermediate expressions.

The adjoint formula for the inverse was first established by Pierre-Simon Laplace in the late 18th century, building on Gabriel Cramer's 1750 work on solving systems of equations (now known as Cramer's rule).

A Worked Example

Find the adjoint of B=(13 25)B = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 3 \ 2 & 5 \end{pmatrix}.

The intuitive (wrong) approach. A student computes the cofactor matrix and forgets to transpose:

cofactor matrix=(5−2 −31)\text{cofactor matrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & -2 \ -3 & 1 \end{pmatrix}

The student writes this as the adjoint.

Why it fails. The adjoint is the transpose of the cofactor matrix — not the cofactor matrix itself. For 2×22 \times 2 matrices, this means swapping the off-diagonal entries.

The correct method. Cofactor matrix above. Transpose:

adj⁡(B)=(5−3 −21)\operatorname{adj}(B) = \begin{pmatrix} 5 & -3 \ -2 & 1 \end{pmatrix}

Verify: det⁡(B)=5−6=−1\det(B) = 5 - 6 = -1. B−1=1−1adj⁡(B)=(−53 2−1)B^{-1} = \tfrac{1}{-1}\operatorname{adj}(B) = \begin{pmatrix} -5 & 3 \ 2 & -1 \end{pmatrix}. Check B⋅B−1=IB \cdot B^{-1} = I ✓.

What Are the Most Common Mistakes With the Adjoint?

Mistake 1: Forgetting to transpose

The fix: The adjoint is the transpose of the cofactor matrix — always do the transpose step.

Mistake 2: Wrong sign pattern

Where it slips in: Putting ++ in (1,2)(1,2) position. The pattern is +,−,+,−,…+, -, +, -, \ldots starting with ++ in (1,1)(1,1).

The fix: Memorise the checkerboard: top-left is ++, and signs alternate from there.

Mistake 3: Confusing minor with cofactor

Where it slips in: Forgetting the (−1)i+j(-1)^{i+j} factor.

The fix: Minor = determinant of submatrix (always positive when computed). Cofactor = minor with the sign applied.

Key Takeaways

  • The adjoint adj⁡(A)\operatorname{adj}(A) is the transpose of the cofactor matrix.

  • Cofactor Cij=(−1)i+jMijC_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j} M_{ij} — the minor with the checkerboard sign.

  • Connection to the inverse: A−1=1det⁡(A)adj⁡(A)A^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{\det(A)} \operatorname{adj}(A) (when det⁡(A)≠0\det(A) \neq 0).

  • For 2×2: swap the diagonal, negate the off-diagonal — that's the adjoint.

  • For 3×3 and larger: compute every cofactor, build the cofactor matrix, transpose.

A Practical Next Step

Try these three before moving on to determinant expansions and Cramer's rule.

  1. Find the adjoint of (62 15)\begin{pmatrix} 6 & 2 \ 1 & 5 \end{pmatrix}.

  2. Use the adjoint formula to find the inverse of (21 43)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \ 4 & 3 \end{pmatrix}.

  3. Compute the cofactor C23C_{23} of (123 456 789)\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 2 & 3 \ 4 & 5 & 6 \ 7 & 8 & 9 \end{pmatrix}.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback helps us write better content

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the adjoint of a matrix?
The adjoint (or adjugate) is the transpose of the cofactor matrix. For each entry, compute its cofactor — the signed minor — then transpose the resulting matrix.
How is the adjoint related to the inverse?
A−1=1det⁡(A)adj⁡(A)A^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{\det(A)} \operatorname{adj}(A). The adjoint provides the direction; the determinant provides the scale.
What is the adjoint of a 2x2 matrix?
For A=(ab cd)A = \begin{pmatrix} a & b \ c & d \end{pmatrix}: adj⁡(A)=(d−b −ca)\operatorname{adj}(A) = \begin{pmatrix} d & -b \ -c & a \end{pmatrix} — swap the diagonal, negate the off-diagonal.
What's the difference between minor and cofactor?
A minor MijM_{ij} is the determinant of the submatrix obtained by deleting row ii and column jj. A cofactor Cij=(−1)i+jMijC_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j} M_{ij} is the minor with a sign applied — positive when i+ji + j is even, negative when odd.
Does the adjoint exist for non-invertible matrices?
Yes — the adjoint is defined for any square matrix, including singular ones. But for singular matrices (det⁡=0\det = 0), you can't use it to compute the inverse (because the formula divides by the determinant).
Is the adjoint the same as the transpose?
No. The transpose of AA is just AA with rows and columns swapped. The adjoint of AA is the transpose of the cofactor matrix — a much more involved construction.
✍️ Written By
Madhukar V
Madhukar V
Math Columnist & Analyst
I see mathematics as more than just numbers and formulas—it is a way of thinking, questioning, and understanding the world around us. I work at the intersection of mathematics, EdTech, technology, and AI-powered learning, I enjoy exploring how mathematical ideas can be made simple, meaningful, and relatable. Through my articles, I aim to present mathematics with curiosity and a practical perspective, helping readers see the beauty and relevance behind every concept in a Bhanzu way.
LinkedIn
Related Articles
Book a FREE Demo ClassBook Now →